<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Invisible SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.willhanke.com/2008/02/15/the-invisible-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.willhanke.com/2008/02/15/the-invisible-seo/</link>
	<description>Saint Louis MO Search Engine Marketing and Optimization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:04:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Louis SEO / Local SEO Will Hanke - &#187; Are All Good SEOs Outrageously Expensive?</title>
		<link>http://www.willhanke.com/2008/02/15/the-invisible-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator>St. Louis SEO / Local SEO Will Hanke - &#187; Are All Good SEOs Outrageously Expensive?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhanke.com/2008/02/15/the-invisible-seo/#comment-728</guid>
		<description>[...] This post is the part two followup to The Invisible SEO. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post is the part two followup to The Invisible SEO. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Niehoff</title>
		<link>http://www.willhanke.com/2008/02/15/the-invisible-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Niehoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willhanke.com/2008/02/15/the-invisible-seo/#comment-718</guid>
		<description>I could not agree more.  I have 2 of my product sites ranking #1 in Google for their keywords, yet my &#039;corporate&#039; site ranks nada.

For many SEO&#039;s, I believe the work comes through references, not through internet search.  If it was the other way around, I guess only 30 SEO&#039;s would be getting any business (the first 3 results pages of Google.)

Great article Will,

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not agree more.  I have 2 of my product sites ranking #1 in Google for their keywords, yet my &#8216;corporate&#8217; site ranks nada.</p>
<p>For many SEO&#8217;s, I believe the work comes through references, not through internet search.  If it was the other way around, I guess only 30 SEO&#8217;s would be getting any business (the first 3 results pages of Google.)</p>
<p>Great article Will,</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

